How, exactly, is trying to prevent people from being harmed by global warming- anti human?- anti freedom?


Best Answer

to prevent people from being "harmed" by global warming- harming is anti human..
As for anti freedom, you are continuing to be a SLAVE to BIG giving up you rights for developing an alternative to oil.

We are not certain what will happen with global warming and it is better to be prepared for the worst and hope it does not happen that way.As Big Oil supplies fertilizer to the farms, so they control the prices.If a warming does occur, the weather will change and areas that used to get yearly rainfalls at the right time of the year may turn into deserts.That is the breadbasket area of the U.S....the midlands so growing crops become nonexistent. California will be hotter than it is now so much of that will become unusable land.We still need food.The whole world is affected and right now we just barely can feed everybody. Have you been in a desert?Lots of sun and no water.Or vice versa .Too much rain and no sun.Lands that have been growing food for centuries now are unusable and maybe new farm land has to be in the mountains.?Or in the ocean because that is where the rain is falling at the right time of the year.?Or there are double the hurricanes the U.S, normally gets in a year and they are double the strength.There are going to be rapid changes as computer modeling can show us.We have a dozen years to change how we do things...because there is no other rock in orbit that is the right distance from the sun to have life.We are stuck on this one.
.It is not impossible to fix.Big oil just wants to sell oil until year 13. They don't care.It is time for INVENTIONS THAT ACTUALLY WORK.New Billionaires can be made.


It isn't.

The idea is good but it depends on how you do it.

Would you be in favour of a process that guaranteed that you would never get lung cancer? Sounds good.

Would you still be in favour if the process involved ripping out your lungs and incinerating them?

This is where we get into the project justification phase of deriving the costs and the benefits. That step seems to escape a lot of people. They just assume because something is "good" then we must do it.

If reducing CO2 emissions means that people can no longer use any form of motorised transport and that currently poor countries will have to remain poor for the foreseeable future then reducing the temperature by a tenth of a degree might not be a priority.

Socialists are necessarily anti-human and anti-freedom.They tend to deny it but history and reality aren't their friends.AGW is all about attacking capitalism by exaggerating the threat from CO2.Being fooled by those exaggerations isn't going to keep people from being harmed by global warming.It will simply make it easier for those wishing to take our freedom and prosperity away from us in the name of saving us.It is an old scam that always seems to work on the gullible among us.

We do our best to change to alternate energy, green living, recycling, rainwater harvesting and other methods to put up with climate change/global warming.
There is nothing anti-human or against freedom in this.

It isn't! That is a lie spread by greedy Capitalists.

It is against the US constitution, which states that there shall be no established religion.

Say what?

The same way protecting Jews from being assaulted anti-Semitic

That’s what the NAZIs claimed the camps were for ... a safe place for them

Fascists and dictatorships always say it’s for the good of the people being oppressed

Its the opposite, if we don't tackle climate change we will be imprisoned

More people die from the cold every year than from heat.